• Client Portal
|
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Request for Proposal
Legacy Retirement Solutions - Third Party Retirement Plan Administration
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Articles
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
Legacy Retirement Solutions - Third Party Retirement Plan Administration
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Articles
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Home
  • Statutory / Regulatory
  • IRS Issues Guidance on Same Sex Marriage

Categories

  • Administration
  • Plan Design
  • Statutory / Regulatory

  • Statutory / Regulatory

IRS Issues Guidance on Same Sex Marriage

  • Posted on January 26, 2014 by Legacy Retirement Solutions

Download PDF

Background

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) as an unconstitutional violation of the 5th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. Section 3 of DOMA defined “marriage” and “spouse” for purposes of Federal law as limited to a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. The elimination of Section 3 of DOMA extends certain marriage rights to same-sex couples under many Federal laws. As a result, guidance from a number of Federal regulatory agencies will be necessary in order to fully integrate the DOMA decision. Although the impact of this decision is much broader than just the world of tax-qualified retirement plans, the remainder of this article focuses exclusively on the retirement plan impact of the decision.

In this regard, on August 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) released Revenue Ruling 2013-17 and certain Frequently Asked Questions (collectively referred to as “the Guidance”) which begin to explain the proper treatment of same-sex spouses under certain employment benefits plans and arrangements. The Guidance becomes effective as of September 16, 2013. However, within the Guidance, the IRS indicated that future guidance will also be issued in order to discuss certain unaddressed issues as well as the potential for the retroactive application of the Guidance. This additional guidance is expected to include consideration of the need for retroactive plan amendments to conform the terms of a plan to its operation in accordance with the new rules.

Rules

In essence, the Guidance establishes that same-sex marriages lawfully performed in any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or a foreign country are valid as marriages under Federal tax law, regardless of where the couple reside. In addition, for Federal tax purposes, the Guidance indicates that the terms “spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband”, “wife” and “marriage” include reference to a lawful same-sex marriage as defined above. Finally, the IRS clearly indicated that registered domestic partnerships, civil unions or other relationships formalized under state law as something other than marriage are not treated as marriage for Federal tax purposes, whether between same-sex or opposite sex individuals. Notwithstanding, in the case of a same-sex couple participating in an unrecognized domestic partnership, civil union, etc., such couple could secure prospective Federal recognition of their relationship by obtaining a valid marriage license from a state or country that recognizes same-sex marriage.

Impact
In practice, the Guidance will generally require Plan Sponsors to treat same-sex spouses equal to opposite-sex spouses for Federal tax purposes, so long as the couple was legally married in a state or other locale that recognizes same-sex marriage.

The following example is derived directly from the Guidance. A qualified defined contribution plan provides that a participant’s account must be paid to the participant’s spouse upon the participant’s death unless the spouse consents in writing to a different beneficiary. Such plan does not provide for any annuity forms of distribution. In that case, in the context of a lawfully performed same-sex marriage, the plan must pay the death benefit to the same-sex surviving spouse of any deceased participant. However, the plan would not be required to provide this death benefit to a surviving registered domestic partner of a deceased participant.

Action Items
First, Plan Sponsors should verify that any of its employees who are participants in a same-sex marriage were “legally” married as that term is considered under the Guidance. This includes confirmation that the relationship truly is a marriage and not a registered domestic partnership, civil union or other relationship formalized under state law as something other than marriage.

Second, Plan Sponsors must be on the alert for future regulatory guidance on retirement plan administration in relation to same-sex spouses. As indicated above, the IRS has stated that it intends to release such guidance. However, it is likely that other regulatory agencies will also release pronouncements on the issue.

Finally, the fact that additional guidance is expected on this issue emphasizes that the full impact of the Supreme Court’s DOMA actions are not yet established and that this entire issue remains in a state of flux. Therefore, be sure to check with your retirement plan service professionals when same-sex spousal retirement benefit questions arise.

Prev
Changes to 404a-5 Participan Fee Disclosure Requires Additional Notifications
What is “New Comparability”?
Next

Recent Administrative Posts

  • ADP Test Basics Corrections
  • ADP Test Basics
  • Form 5500

Recent Plan Design Posts

  • Safe Harbor 401(k) Establishment Deadline
  • Safe Harbor 401(k) Establishment Deadlines
  • The Power of Combining Plans

Recent Statutory / Regulatory Posts

  • Tax Credit For Small Employer Start-Up Plans
  • ADP Test Basics Corrections
  • ADP Test Basics

Archived Articles A-Z

  • A-E
  • F-J
  • K-O
  • P-T
  • U-Y
  • Z-Z

A-E

  • Defined Benefit Plan Year Compliance Package
  • Delay to Deadline for Plan Sponsors to Make Retirement Plan Contributions
  • Department of Labor Releases New Guidance on Missing Participants
  • CARES Act – Retirement Plan Impact
  • Cashing-Out Terminated Employees From Your Company’s Retirement Plan
  • ADP Test Basics
  • ADP Test Basics
  • ADP Test Basics
  • ADP Test Basics
  • ADP Test Basics Corrections
  • ADP Test Corrections
  • Changes to DOL Late Deferral Remittance Enforcement Procedure
  • Changes to 404a-5 Participan Fee Disclosure Requires Additional Notifications
  • Congress Enacts Changes to Hardship Withdrawal Rules
  • Consequences of Failing to Timely Adopt a PPA Restatement
  • Employing the Proper Definition of Compensation
  • Correcting Average Deferral Percentage Test Failures
  • Correcting Average Deferral Percentage Test Failures
  • Are Your SEP Plans Safe From Other Financial Advisors?
  • Are You Ready For Your Next Plan year end?
  • ERISA Bond: What Is It and Do I Need ONe?
  • ERISA Bond: What Is It and Do I Need One?
  • A Plan Administrator’s “Due Diligence” Obligations
  • A Plan for Retirement Plan Compliance 2014
Back to top

F-J

  • Important CARES Act 2020 RMD Rollover Deadline Fast Approaching
  • Form 5500
  • Form 5500 Update
  • Form 5500 Update
  • IRS Creates Permanent Form 5500 Penalty Relief Program for Non-ERISA Plans
  • IRS Expands Retirement Plan Sponsors’ Self-Correction Options
  • IRS Expands Use of Pre-Approved Plan Documents To Cash Balance Plans
  • IRS Grants Form 5500 Penalty Relief for Non-ERISA Plans
  • IRS Grants 401(k) Safe Harbor Suspension Relief
  • IRS Issues Final Regulations on Mid-Year Reduction or Suspension of Safe Harbor Contributions
  • IRS Issues Guidance on Same Sex Marriage
  • IRS Issues Guidance Regarding Uncashed Check
  • IRS Revisits Mid-Plan Year Changes to Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans
  • IRS Provides Guidance on Expansion of In-Plan Roth Rollovers
Back to top

K-O

  • Legacy Solo(k) Plans 2016
  • NAPA Conference
  • New Opportunity In-Plan Roth Conversions
  • Limitations On Mid-Plan Year Amendments To Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans
Back to top

P-T

  • Safe Harbor 401(k) Establishment Deadline
  • Safe Harbor 401(k) Establishment Deadlines
  • Required Minimum Distributions
  • Required Minimum Distributions
  • Required Minimum Distributions
  • Tax Credit for Small Employer Start-Up Plans
  • Tax Credit For Small Employer Start-Up Plans
  • Tax Credit for Small Employer Start-Up Plans
  • Tax Credit For Small Employer Start-Up Plans
  • The SECURE Act – Plan Sponsor Impact – Part 1
  • The SECURE Act – Plan Sponsor Impact – Part 2
  • The SECURE Act – Plan Sponsor Impact – Part 3
  • The Power of Combining Plans
  • The Problem with Using Forfeitures to Satisfy Employer Contributions
  • Plan Sponsors Must Retain Hardship and Loan Documentation
  • Plan Year Compliance Package
  • Plan Year Compliance Packages
  • Solo 401(k) Brochure
  • Treasury Issues Proposed Hardship Withdrawal Regulations
Back to top

U-Y

  • What are “Cash Balance Plans”?
  • What is “New Comparability”?
Back to top

 

 

 

 

Phone: 484-483-1044     E-mail: marketing@legacyrsllc.com     Address: 700 Turner Industrial Way, Suite 110, Aston, PA 19014     Follow Us: LinkedIn

© Copyright 2019 Legacy Retirement Solutions - All Rights Reserved - Design by CrafTech Computer Solutions

 

Links

  • Overview
  • Principals
  • Staff